[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705242308.38360.ak@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 23:08:38 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
On Thursday 24 May 2007 23:01:04 Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:55:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 May 2007 15:46:37 -0700
> > Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo. This feature
> > > will be enabled automatically by current acpi-cpufreq driver and cpufreq.
> >
> > So you're saying that the cpufreq code in Linus's tree aleady supports IDA?
> > If so, this is a 2.6.22 patch, isn't it?
>
> From my limited understanding[*], ida is the "We're single threaded,
> disable the 2nd core, and clock the first core faster" magic.
> It doesn't need code-changes, as its all done in hardware afaik.
P0 is somewhat visible to software, but it should be pretty transparent
>
> identifying & exporting the flags on earlier kernels should be harmless,
> but not really 'mustfix'.
I think it's generally a good idea to push cpuinfo flags in earliest
as possible; just make sure we actually use the final name (so that we don't get
into a pni->sse3 mess again)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists