[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070524221743.GD9604@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 00:17:43 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Romano Giannetti <romanol@...omillas.es>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...nel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
On Thu 2007-05-24 15:10:29, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >
> > > Equally arguably, we should just have a "resume_late()" call that can be
> > > used to do this after everything is up and running.
> >
> > Yes, we can do that. But userland will see devices "not there" for a
> > few seconds after boot.
>
> No they won't.
>
> Why the HELL cannot you realize that kernel threads are different?
Ugh? We are talking about request_firmware() here, right? That's
calling userland helper to load the firmware...? Looks like USER
thread to me.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists