[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070524223047.GA14641@linuxtv.org>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 00:30:47 +0200
From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@...uxtv.org>
To: Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@...il.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:51:53PM +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 23:12 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> >
> > I really cannot see why it makes a difference.
> > If you use += (and :=) make will resolve EXTRA_CFLAGS when it see it.
> > Whereas with = make will resolve it only when actually referenced.
> >
> > But the way we use EXTRA_CFLAGS it should not matter.
> > If the fix above really helps nfs I need to take a closer look tomorrow.
>
> No, you're right, it doesn't help. What could help is a form of saying
> to make "add this EXTRA_CFLAGS to whatever is specified in the command
> line". No idea if it exists.
The GNU make manual says:
"To append more text to a variable defined on the command line, use:
override VARIABLE += MORE TEXT
"
HTH,
Johannes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists