linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 May 2007 15:54:28 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Richard Purdie <richard@...nedhand.com>
Cc:	Michael-Luke Jones <mlj28@....ac.uk>,
	Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm-cc@...top.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3

On Thu, 24 May 2007 23:41:22 +0100
Richard Purdie <richard@...nedhand.com> wrote:

> I'll not send a "rename to unsafe" patch for the LZO core until Andrew
> decides whether to drop the unsafe version entirely or not as per your
> patch. If he doesn't due to the potential use by the compressed cache
> people, I will send that patch.

I'd have thought that a 3% performance difference isn't worth worrying
about.  Especially when reclaiming that 3% costs an additional 500 lines
of pretty yukky code.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/