[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <653FFBB4508B9042B5D43DC9E18836F5EE129C@scsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:13:04 -0700
From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>, "Dave Jones" <davej@...hat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
>-----Original Message-----
>From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa@...or.com]
>Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:04 PM
>To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>Cc: Andi Kleen; Dave Jones; Andrew Morton; Brown, Len; linux-kernel
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration
>feature in /proc/cpuinfo
>
>Venki Pallipadi wrote:
>>
>> I can do it in intel setup function. But, the feature may
>not be activated
>> unless the driver is loaded. Going by the hardware capability point
>> of view, we can do it in setup function.
>>
>> The feature appears in CPUID 6 (called Power Management
>Leaf) instead of
>> regular CPUID 1 features.
>>
>
>This sounds like it should be a new CPUID word?
>
Yes. But it only has 3 features defined right now. 2 in EAX and one in
ECX. Should I use 2 new words for these bits or just use the software
defined bits as in my earlier patch?
Thanks,
Venki
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists