[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070525013817.26061764@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 01:38:17 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1: IDE compile error
> The question I'm asking is: do you think it's better to remove this from
> hd.c, or do you think it's better to add it back boot code BIOS
> detection (and take the risk of poking an ST-506 disk with legacy data
> with parameters which may belong to another disk -- keep in mind this
> can permanently damage an ST-506 disk)?
To set it up the user will have to know the parameters and have typed
them into the BIOS (if it even has an option for it). I see no problem
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists