[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070525113124.GA31976@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:31:24 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix sched_clock()
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > > please send me your current sched-clock.c, i'll redo any remaining
> > > cleanups.
> >
> > It needs at least one new preliminary patch (to add on_cpu_single);
> > please get the series from
> > ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches-2.6.22-rc2-git7-070525-1.tar.gz
> > You need at least tsc-unstable upto paravirt-add-a-sched_clock-paravirt
> > for everything
> i'm looking at the other things now.
your queue does not apply cleanly here:
Applying patch patches/paravirt-add-a-sched_clock-paravirt_op
patching file arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c
Hunk #5 FAILED at 148.
1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c
could you please just send me your current sched-clock.c? (that's what
i'm interested in) I'll deal with the on_cpu_single() dependency.
Thanks,
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists