[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1myztaq5s.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 09:17:35 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Jay Cliburn <jacliburn@...lsouth.net>,
Grzegorz Krzystek <ninex@...eX.eu.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, ninex@...pl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] msi: Invert the sense of the MSI enables.
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> writes:
> Originally I would have thought this would be a good idea, but now that
> Vista is out, which supports MSI, I don't think we are going to need
> this in the future. All new chipsets should support MSI fine and this
> table will only grow in the future, while the blacklist should not need
> to have many new entries added to it.
>
> So I don't think this is a good idea, sorry.
- The current situation is broken
- In spec hardware does not require MSI to generate interrupts
Which leaves enabling MSI optional.
Do you have a better idea to solve the current brokenness?
MSI appears to have enough problems that enabling it in a kernel
that is supposed to run lots of different hardware (like a distro
kernel) is a recipe for disaster.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists