[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4cefeab80705251033g6c8bdfb0l1499befb355b9c0f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 23:03:33 +0530
From: "Nitin Gupta" <nitingupta910@...il.com>
To: "Bret Towe" <magnade@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Richard Purdie" <richard@...nedhand.com>, linux-mm-cc@...top.org,
"Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
On 5/25/07, Bret Towe <magnade@...il.com> wrote:
> On 5/24/07, Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com> wrote:
> > On 5/25/07, Bret Towe <magnade@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On 5/24/07, Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > On 5/23/07, Bret Towe <magnade@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 5/23/07, Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com> wrote:
>
> [ 237.556167] LZO compress successful: orig_size=17448, comp_size=8183
> [ 253.320760] LZO decompress successful: decomp_size=17448
>
> 2221c586e3eb869af7f4333d4f56b441b9aa8414 test-input
> 2e6c96b687274b629308b29835cebd3af989e0c7 output
>
> ppc however seems bust
> the computer is a g4 mini
Since lzo1x_decompress() itself is saying that decompression was
successful, it is really strange to have different sha-sums. It seems
that it's the fault with compress-test module itself. I will look more
closely into this and reply back.
Thanks,
Nitin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists