linux-kernel - Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups, #2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 May 2007 20:08:01 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups, #2

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:49:38AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 25 May 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > ok - then please merge that single hunk into the paravirtops patch - and 
> > leave the other 6 hunks in this patch.
> 
> Note: I'm actually much more interested in applying the scheduler changes 
> than the paravirt-ops changes. It looks like CFS is getting stable, I'd 

That's ok -- that is why I'm keeping this stuff separate.
paravirt ops sched_clock is just on top of the new sched_clock() but
sched_clock doesn't rely on it.

Also my understanding is that CFS works even without the new sched_clock,
just the new one makes it work better.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/