[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070525180801.GC24083@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 20:08:01 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups, #2
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:49:38AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > ok - then please merge that single hunk into the paravirtops patch - and
> > leave the other 6 hunks in this patch.
>
> Note: I'm actually much more interested in applying the scheduler changes
> than the paravirt-ops changes. It looks like CFS is getting stable, I'd
That's ok -- that is why I'm keeping this stuff separate.
paravirt ops sched_clock is just on top of the new sched_clock() but
sched_clock doesn't rely on it.
Also my understanding is that CFS works even without the new sched_clock,
just the new one makes it work better.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists