[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070525203730.GA5974@atjola.homenet>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 22:37:30 +0200
From: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: double exclamation (!!) suckage in the kernel
On 2007.05.26 01:53:59 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Grepping through the sources I found 500+ occurrences of double
> exclamation marks before identifier names (such as !!x -- I took care
> to ignore occurrences of !! inside comment blocks, because there
> are plenty of that sort too).
>
> !! are to be found even in the definitions of common macros such as
> likely() and unlikely(), which hundreds of eyes must have seen over
> the last year or so ...
>
> Are all these occurrences merely the debris of
> s/something/!notsomething/g kind of patches or is there some
> dark, unknown C / gcc wizardry I have absolutely no clue of?
It avoids useless warnings. If you have a pointer and want to store if
it is NULL/non-NULL in an integer variables, you have to use !x or !!x.
Just using x will result in a warning that you convert a pointer to an
integer without a cast.
Given this example:
int main()
{
int ret;
void *foo;
ret = foo;
ret = !!foo;
return 0;
}
gcc will emit this warning:
ttt.c:6: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast
HTH
Björn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists