linux-kernel - Re: double exclamation (!!) suckage in the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 May 2007 22:36:49 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: double exclamation (!!) suckage in the kernel

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:32:13PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 02:26:11AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > also be brave enough to take a C quiz here :-)
> > 
> > >        what type should x have for !!x to be a valid expression?
> > 
> > Any integer type (includes pointers)
> 
> Er, no...  Pointers are not integer types *and* you can use ! on any
> scalar type (including floating ones, even though it's not particulary
> useful there).

... which means that original question ("what type should x have...")
gets the answer "scalars, arrays or functions".  The last two variants
give you constant 1, though (arrays and functions decay to pointers in
such context and that pointer is not going to be different from null
pointer of the same type; thus you get !!x => !0 => 1).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/