[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lkfdpjm7.fsf@jbms.ath.cx>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 01:17:36 -0400
From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor 01/41] Pass struct vfsmount to the inode_create LSM hook
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> writes:
> On Fedora zcat, gzip and gunzip are all links to the same file.
> I can imagine (although it is a bit of a stretch) allowing a set
> of users access to gunzip but not gzip (or the other way around).
> There are probably more sophisticated programs that have different
> behavior based on the name they're invoked by that would provide
> a more compelling arguement, assuming of course that you buy into
> the behavior-based-on-name scheme. What I think I'm suggesting is
> that AppArmor might be useful in addressing the fact that a file
> with multiple hard links is necessarily constrained to have the
> same access control on each of those names. That assumes one
> believes that such behavior is flawwed, and I'm not going to try
> to argue that. The question was about an example, and there is one.
This doesn't work. The behavior depends on argv[0], which is not
necessarily the same as the name of the file.
--
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists