[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070526021013.GA11490@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 22:10:13 -0400
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Current utrace breaks UML
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:35:13PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Oops! I overlooked the need to preserve the orig_eax value, though its
> necessity is obvious. This makes me wonder about those previous
> reports that UML was working OK.
The one from me was on x86_64, where PTRACE_SYSEMU isn't an issue yet.
> I've fixed this in the latest utrace patch set. I also wired up
> sysemu on x86_64. This means 32-bit processes calling ptrace now
> support it for full compatibility with native i386, which the vanilla
> kernel does not. It also means it works for 64-bit ptrace calls,
> whether operating on a 64-bit or a 32-bit target process.
Beautiful!
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists