[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705262300.36611.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:00:36 +0200
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@....de>
Cc: Larry Finger <larry.finger@...inger.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@...monizer.de>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
On Saturday 26 May 2007 22:33:13 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:57 schrieben Sie:
> > Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > OK, applied this one against 2.6.22-rc3, assuming a typo error by you,
> > > Andrew.
> > >
> > > Result is: No change: non functionable b44 device!
> >
> > Could you please send the following:
> >
> > 1. the output of lsmod from the non-functioning kernel
>
> Nonsense!
> As I stated already, both modules (i. e. b44 and ssb) are loaded correctly.
> So please read the thread before you post that, not vice versa!
Ok, Uwe. Now I show you some real life examples how you and how
someone who is polite answers to the same question:
You:
> Nonsense!
> As I stated already, both modules (i. e. b44 and ssb) are loaded correctly.
> So please read the thread before you post that, not vice versa!
> They are already in the thread. So please leave me alone with those lazy
> hints! Read bfore you post, not vice versa!
Someone who is polite:
> They are already in the thread.
So you see the difference? And do you see why everybody in this
thread is so pissed about you?
--
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists