[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070526.154910.78725926.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: abraham.manu@...il.com
Cc: rdreier@...co.com, greg@...ah.com,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCIE
From: Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 19:03:12 +0400
> i presume then i shouldn't be using IRQF_SHARED, if using MSI.
That's actually a really good question.
It is likely architecture dependant whether the PCI controller wires
unique MSI interrupts to shared cpu interrupt lines.
I can imagine many systems where the cpu simply doesn't have enough
interrupt pins to uniquely identify every possible MSI interrupt
source.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists