[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4657EC24.1030407@trash.net>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 10:13:24 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Adam Osuchowski <adwol@...k.pl>
CC: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [BUG] Dropping fragmented IP packets within VLAN frames
on bridge
Adam Osuchowski wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
>>It would be better to account for the tag in the length check.
>>Something like
>> if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
>> skb->len > skb->dev->mtu - (IS_VLAN_IP(skb) ? VLAN_HLEN : 0) &&
>> !skb_is_gso(skb))
>> return ip_fragment ...
>
>
> It isn't good solution because one of IS_VLAN_IP() necessary condition is
>
> skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_8021Q)
>
> which is, of course, mutually exclusive with
>
> skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)
>
> from br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(). IMHO, one should check length of ETH_P_IP
> and ETH_P_8021Q frames separately:
>
> if (((skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP) && skb->len > skb->dev->mtu) ||
> (IS_VLAN_IP(skb) && skb->len > skb->dev->mtu - VLAN_HLEN)) &&
> !skb_is_gso(skb))
> return ip_fragment ...
net/8021q ignores the VLAN header overhead, so we should probably do the
same here for consistency. Using IS_VLAN_IP (and IS_PPPOE_IP for current
-rc) looks fine, additionally we should probably also check for
skb->nfct != NULL to make sure that at least without connection tracking
the bridge doesn't perform fragmentation.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists