| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:23:30 +0100 From: Michael-Luke Jones <mlj28@....ac.uk> To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Cc: Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com>, Richard Purdie <richard@...nedhand.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm-cc@...top.org Subject: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3 On 25 May 2007, at 11:42, Pavel Machek wrote: > What is the performance difference between safe and unsafe version? On 24 May 2007, at 23:26, Richard Purdie wrote: > For my minilzo kernel patch, the safe version showed a 7.2% > performance > hit. The conclusion seemed to be that we should drop the 'unsafe' version on this basis. Michael-Luke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists