linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <C7B006D9-08C2-4F44-9DCE-9753F7DB4D3F@cam.ac.uk>
Date:	Sat, 26 May 2007 11:23:30 +0100
From:	Michael-Luke Jones <mlj28@....ac.uk>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com>,
	Richard Purdie <richard@...nedhand.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm-cc@...top.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3

On 25 May 2007, at 11:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
> What is the performance difference between safe and unsafe version?

On 24 May 2007, at 23:26, Richard Purdie wrote:
> For my minilzo kernel patch, the safe version showed a 7.2%  
> performance
> hit.

The conclusion seemed to be that we should drop the 'unsafe' version  
on this basis.

Michael-Luke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/