lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c0942db0705260813g6aeedbfepc0afa94ba3550e5b@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 26 May 2007 08:13:06 -0700
From:	"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To:	"Tommy Vercetti" <vercetti@...w.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21.1 - 97% wait time on IDE operations

On 5/26/07, Tommy Vercetti <vercetti@...w.org> wrote:
> I was trying to get answer to my question around, but no one knows.
> I do have DMA turned on, etc, yet - on extensive harddrive operations wait

You may have DMA turned on, but it may be ineffectual if you don't
have the right IDE driver handing your disk.

> time is 90+% , which means that machine is waiting, rather than doing
> something meanwhile. (I guess).

What does hdparm -tT /dev/hda say? If the numbers are reasonable
(~400MB/s for cache reads, ~25MB/s for buffered disk reads), then
you're just doing a lot of seeking on the drive, and that takes a long
time. (Drives can seek about 100 times a second. If every seek reads
only 4k of data, that's 400k of data processed per second, or a lot of
time spent with the CPU waiting on I/O.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ