[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705270924310.26602@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 09:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Romano Giannetti <romanol@...omillas.es>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...nel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> As far as I can tell the PPC code simply shuts down the devices without
> worrying about userspace at all. If this was reliable, what prevents us
> from simply disabling the freezer for STR?
Personally, I think that's the right thing to do.
And by "disabling the freezer", I think we should just not call it at all.
However, sadly, right now it's called from common code. I'll happily take
a tested patch to split that code sequence up, and try to do it in 2.6.23,
if somebody has the energy (I'm getting to the point where I may just do
it myself, but my lazy nature still hopes for a STR person to step
forward).
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists