linux-kernel - Re: PCIE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4659EA85.2010700@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 May 2007 00:31:01 +0400
From:	Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	hpa@...or.com, rdreier@...co.com, greg@...ah.com,
	linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCIE

David Miller wrote:
> From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 19:34:26 -0700
> 
>> There are systems which only get a single bit indication that an MSI has
>> happened.
>>
>> Presumably we need something like IRQF_MSI which can be set as
>> appropriate depending on the architecture?
> 
> Although I don't want to make the IRQ handling subsystems any more
> complicated than they already are, one idea I floated around is that
> we could seperate CPU irq numbers (the things we pass around today)
> and MSI vector numbers.
> 
> But I immediately understand how that is unnecessary to some extent,
> any platform which needs to deal with that kind of distinction can use
> virtual IRQ numbers like sparc64 and powerpc do.
> 
> Sparc64 PCI-E controllers, for example, allow you to group several
> MSIs into a 'group', and the interrupt source is for the group rather
> than the individual MSIs.  When the MSI group interrupt arrives, you
> get a descriptor in a per-MSI-group ring buffer that describes the MSI
> that arrived.
> 
> This descriptor in fact passes on a ton of interesting information,
> see arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_sun4v.c:pci_sun4v_msiq_entry.
> 
> It gives you the type, the system TSC value at the time of interrupt
> arrival (so you could do incredibly cool profiling with this),
> the PCI bus/device/fn that generated the MSI vector, the MSI address
> that was signalled, the MSI data field, and full information for PCI-E
> MSG packets including bus/dev/fn of target, the message routing code,
> and the message code.
> 
> But we use none of these facilities currently because it's either
> impossible or too cumbersome to be useful at the moment.
> 

I think it is better to use IRQF_MSI as HPA suggested, since IRQF_SHARED
is a bit confusing thing altogether since MSI doesn't share interrupts.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/