[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070527212002.GI3989@ucw.cz>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 21:20:03 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
Cc: David Greaves <david@...eaves.com>,
Linux Kernel M/L <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.21.1] resume doesn't run suspended kernel?
Hi!
> >It is very dangerous to attempt a resume with a
> >different kernel than the one
> >that has gone to sleep.
> >Different kernels may be compiled with different
> >options that affect where or
> >how in-memory structures are saved.
> >
> If the mainline resume is depending on that no wonder
> resume is so fragile. User action can change order of
> module loads, kmalloc calls move allocated structures,
> etc. Counting on anything to be locked in place seems
> naive.
Look at code before spreading FUD. (suspend and suspend2 are same in
this matter).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists