lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18750.1180255870@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 27 May 2007 09:51:10 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AFS: Implement file locking

J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:

> > > Do you allow upgrades and downgrades?  (Just curious.)
> > 
> > AFS does not, as far as I know.
> 
> So if I request a write lock while holding a read lock, my request will
> be denied?

At the moment, yes.  Don't the POSIX and flock lock-handling routines in the
kernel normally do that anyway?

> This is a little strange, though--if there's somebody waiting for a
> write lock on an inode (because somebody else already holds a read lock
> on it), that shouldn't block requests for read locks.

That depends on whether you want fairness or not.  Allowing read locks to jump
the queue like this can lead to starvation for your writers.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ