lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a3acf9f0705280359s2d4d507bs97d060889f44ba41@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 May 2007 18:59:31 +0800
From:	"内核追踪" <kerneltrack@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: question about __block_commit_write

Hi, all.
   In the snippet code, I add a printk into block_commit_write, I want
to get the bh's block number and device number . I recompiled it in
2.4.20. But I surprise that mutliple output lines are the same.

static int __block_commit_write(struct inode *inode, struct page
*page,  unsigned from, unsigned to)
{
 unsigned block_start, block_end;
 int partial = 0, need_balance_dirty = 0;
 unsigned blocksize;
 struct buffer_head *bh, *head;

 blocksize = 1 << inode->i_blkbits;

 for(bh = head = page->buffers, block_start = 0;
     bh != head || !block_start;
     block_start=block_end, bh = bh->b_this_page) {
  block_end = block_start + blocksize;
  if (block_end <= from || block_start >= to) {
   if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
    partial = 1;
  } else {
@+   printk(KERN_ERR"dev is %d, blocknr is %d\n", bh->b_dev, bh->b_blocknr);
   set_bit(BH_Uptodate, &bh->b_state);
   if (!atomic_set_buffer_dirty(bh)) {
    __mark_dirty(bh);
    buffer_insert_inode_data_queue(bh, inode);
    need_balance_dirty = 1;
   }
  }
 }

 if (need_balance_dirty)
  balance_dirty();
 /*
  * is this a partial write that happened to make all buffers
  * uptodate then we can optimize away a bogus readpage() for
  * the next read(). Here we 'discover' wether the page went
  * uptodate as a result of this (potentially partial) write.
  */
 if (!partial)
  SetPageUptodate(page);
 return 0;
}


The ouput is following :
dev is 5640, blocknr is 14223
dev is 5640, blocknr is 14223
dev is 5640, blocknr is 14223
dev is 5640, blocknr is 14223
dev is 5640, blocknr is 14223
dev is 5640, blocknr is 14223
.....




I do not know why happened like these?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ