[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18010.47701.751118.336431@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 15:17:41 +0400
From: Nikita Danilov <nikita@...sterfs.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices,
filesystems, and dm/md.
Neil Brown writes:
>
[...]
> Thus the general sequence might be:
>
> a/ issue all "preceding writes".
> b/ issue the commit write with BIO_RW_BARRIER
> c/ wait for the commit to complete.
> If it was successful - done.
> If it failed other than with EOPNOTSUPP, abort
> else continue
> d/ wait for all 'preceding writes' to complete
> e/ call blkdev_issue_flush
> f/ issue commit write without BIO_RW_BARRIER
> g/ wait for commit write to complete
> if it failed, abort
> h/ call blkdev_issue
> DONE
>
> steps b and c can be left out if it is known that the device does not
> support barriers. The only way to discover this to try and see if it
> fails.
>
> I don't think any filesystem follows all these steps.
It seems that steps b/ -- h/ are quite generic, and can be implemented
once in a generic code (with some synchronization mechanism like
wait-queue at d/).
Nikita.
[...]
>
> Thank you for your attention.
>
> NeilBrown
>
Nikita.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists