linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070528143939.GA16026@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 28 May 2007 16:39:39 +0200
From:	Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header.

* Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com> [2007-05-28 13:09]:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > * Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com> [2007-05-01 07:06]:
> > > This seems to be a problem with gdb 6.5. I transferred the dump to a
> > > different machine having GNU gdb 6.4, and it works fine there.
> > 
> > What's the state of it? Andy, was the GDB breakage the reason why you
> > didn't merge it? Did someone file a GDB bug?
> 
> I had sent a mail to gdb mailing list but no response. Did not raise
> a bug though.

BTW: Did anyone test with GDB 6.6?


Thanks,
   Bernhard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/