[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070528153055.GN3899@stusta.de>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:30:55 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm-cc@...top.org,
linuxcompressed-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Richard Purdie <richard@...nedhand.com>,
Bret Towe <magnade@...il.com>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:10:31PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is tester code used for testing.
> (developed by Daniel Hazelton -- modified slightly to now use 'take 6'
> version for 'TinyLZO')
>
> Cheers,
> Nitin
>
> On 5/28/07, Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com> wrote:
>> (Using tester program from Daniel)
>>
>> Following compares this kernel port ('take 6') vs original miniLZO code:
>>
>> 'TinyLZO' refers to this kernel port.
>>
>> 10000 run averages:
>> 'Tiny LZO':
>> Combined: 61.2223 usec
>> Compression: 41.8412 usec
>> Decompression: 19.3811 usec
>> 'miniLZO':
>> Combined: 66.0444 usec
>> Compression: 46.6323 usec
>> Decompression: 19.4121 usec
>>
>> Result:
>> Overall: TinyLZO is 7.3% faster
>> Compressor: TinyLZO is 10.2% faster
>> Decompressor: TinyLZO is 0.15% faster
So your the compressor of your version runs 10.2% faster than the
original version.
That's a huge difference.
Why exactly is it that much faster?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists