| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200705281551.05506.dhazelton@enter.net> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 15:51:05 -0400 From: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> Cc: Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm-cc@...top.org, linuxcompressed-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Richard Purdie <richard@...nedhand.com>, Bret Towe <magnade@...il.com>, Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6 On Monday 28 May 2007 13:01:09 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:55:14AM -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote: > >... > > This is my guess as well. Though performance will likely drop when I make > > the noinline macro mean something. (This may be offset by figuring out a > > way to make likely() and unlikely() also have a meaningful effect in > > userspace). ... > > What is your problem? > > The likely/unlikely macros aren't in any way depending on any kernel > infrastructure. That I'm just plain lazy and haven't felt like pulling them out of the kernel sources ? Actually, that is the case - and I wasn't exactly sure that likely() and unlikely() were completely decoupled from the kernel's infrastructure. DRH > > DRH > > cu > Adrian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists