linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] RTC: Use fallback IRQ if PNP tables don't provide one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200705281406.44340.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date:	Mon, 28 May 2007 14:06:41 -0700
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RTC: Use fallback IRQ if PNP tables don't provide one

On Monday 28 May 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
> 
> Intel Macs (and possibly other machines) provide a PNP entry for the 
> RTC, but provide no IRQ. As a result the rtc-cmos driver doesn't allow 
> wakeup alarms. If the RTC is located at the legacy ioport range, assume 
> that it's on IRQ 8 unless the tables say otherwise.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>

> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> index 6085261..e24ea82 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> @@ -641,9 +641,16 @@ cmos_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev *pnp, const struct pnp_device_id *id)
>  	 * drivers can't provide shutdown() methods to disable IRQs.
>  	 * Or better yet, fix PNP to allow those methods...
>  	 */
> -	return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev,
> -			&pnp->res.port_resource[0],
> -			pnp->res.irq_resource[0].start);
> +	if (pnp_port_start(pnp,0) == 0x70 && !pnp_irq_valid(pnp,0))
> +		/* Some machines contain a PNP entry for the RTC, but
> +		 * don't define the IRQ. It should always be safe to
> +		 * hardcode it in these cases
> +		 */
> +		return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev, &pnp->res.port_resource[0], 8);
> +	else
> +		return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev,
> +				     &pnp->res.port_resource[0],
> +				     pnp->res.irq_resource[0].start);
>  }
>  
>  static void __exit cmos_pnp_remove(struct pnp_dev *pnp)
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/