| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <64026d4a0705272113j2ec7f85eqbcfdad814c00f453@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:43:25 +0530 From: "pradeep singh" <p.singh.rautela@...il.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Altering kernel path execution using module On 5/28/07, pradeep singh <p.singh.rautela@...il.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Is it possible to change the normal kernel execution path using a > loadable module, without actually patching the kernel? > e.g > fun1()->fun2()->fun3()->fun4()->fun5()->fun6() > > Can i change this method invocation sequence to a custom sequence > using *only* loadable modules? > > i.e > fun1()->fun2()-->myfun1()-->myfun2()....->fun4()->fun5()->fun6(). > > And i do not want to replace any in kernel methods with my custom hooks. > > Tried asking on kernelnewbies but i am not satisfied with the > debuggers pointed as help(i.e kprobes). > > Apologies if this is too trivial for you all. > > Any help? Please CC to me as i am not subscribed to the lkml. thanks --pradeep > > Thanks > --pradeep > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists