lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64026d4a0705272113j2ec7f85eqbcfdad814c00f453@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 May 2007 09:43:25 +0530
From:	"pradeep singh" <p.singh.rautela@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Altering kernel path execution using module

On 5/28/07, pradeep singh <p.singh.rautela@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is it possible to change the normal kernel execution path using a
> loadable module, without actually patching the kernel?
> e.g
>     fun1()->fun2()->fun3()->fun4()->fun5()->fun6()
>
> Can i change this method invocation sequence to a custom sequence
> using *only* loadable modules?
>
> i.e
>    fun1()->fun2()-->myfun1()-->myfun2()....->fun4()->fun5()->fun6().
>
> And i do not want to replace any in kernel methods with my custom hooks.
>
> Tried asking on kernelnewbies but i am not satisfied with the
> debuggers pointed as help(i.e kprobes).
>
> Apologies if this is too trivial for you all.
>
> Any help?
Please CC to me as i am not subscribed to the lkml.
thanks
--pradeep
>
> Thanks
> --pradeep
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ