[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070528010506.GA24186@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 02:05:06 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Romano Giannetti <romanol@...omillas.es>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...nel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:44:02PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Anyway. I've tested the following patch on a dual-core x86. No obvious
> issues yet, but I'll try to put it through a few hundred cycles.
This /mostly/ works - I've had my test machine cycling through a suspend
cycle every 10 seconds for the past hour without any difficulties
providing I unload USB first. If USB is loaded, the suspend occasionally
fails with one of the devices returning -EBUSY and causing it to be
aborted. I haven't looked into this in any detail yet, but it's
presumably sufficiently generic code that it's potentially biting people
on PPC anyway.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists