[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070529132158.GA2192@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:21:58 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Bill Huey <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] lockdep: sanitise CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:52:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Ensure that all of the lock dependency tracking code is under
> CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. This allows us to use the held lock tracking code
> for other purposes.
There's an awfull lot of ifdefs introduced in this patch, I wonder
whether it might be better to split up lockdep.c at those boundaries.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists