[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705290752190.26602@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 07:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Romano Giannetti <romanol@...omillas.es>
cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...nel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote:
>
> - The good (?) news. I have made 7 suspend/resume cycle (to ram, I
> haven't tested hibernation) with a 2.6.21.2 with that patch, applied
> manually. The system did suspend and resume nicely even compiling a
> kernel and opening openoffice. Normally (le me stress _normally_) no
> delay was apparent on resume. I do not know how dangerous is this... :-)
>
> - The bad (?) news. One time out of 7 I had the 60 seconds delay.
Interesting. If you can re-create it, please do the sysrq-T thing again,
to see what's up. (Also, you might do "sysrq-p", which gives the current
process data, which sysrq-T does not).
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists