linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc2-mm1] sysfs: reduce memory footprint of sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d120d5000705290904s706763bfj7beb837397f54d86@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 May 2007 12:04:30 -0400
From:	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	"Tejun Heo" <htejun@...il.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, cornelia.huck@...ibm.com, oneukum@...e.de,
	rpurdie@...ys.net, stern@...land.harvard.edu, maneesh@...ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc2-mm1] sysfs: reduce memory footprint of sysfs_dirent

Hi Tejun,

On 5/28/07, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> This patchset reduces the size of sysfs_dirent to 88 byte from 136 on
> 64bit and to 52 from 76 on 32bit.  Combined with forthcoming
> reclaimable sysfs directories, this will make sysfs much more scalable
> on very large machines and very small machines.
>
> This patchset contains the following three patches.
>
> #01: move-s_active-functions-to-fs-sysfs-dir-c, prep for #02
> #02: slim-down-sysfs_dirent-s_active
> #03: use-signly-linked-list-for-sysfs_dirent-tree
>
> I'm pretty sure #02 is a good idea but #03 is debatable.  The code
> doesn't look much uglier after the conversion tho.  Inputs welcome.
>

I think that #3 is a good idea as well - we have a lot of sysfs
objects on any given system and slimming down sysfs benefits everyone.

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/