[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705291057170.24126@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] Allow CONFIG_MIGRATION to be set without CONFIG_NUMA
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:
> CONFIG_MIGRATION currently depends on CONFIG_NUMA. move_pages() is the only
> user of migration today and as this system call is only meaningful on NUMA,
> it makes sense. However, memory compaction will operate within a zone and is
> useful on both NUMA and non-NUMA systems. This patch allows CONFIG_MIGRATION
> to be used in all memory models. To preserve existing behaviour, move_pages()
> is only available when CONFIG_NUMA is set.
Hmmm... I thought I had this already set up so that it would be easy to
switch page migration to not depend on CONFIG_NUMA. Not so it seems.
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-005_migrate_nocontext/include/linux/migrate.h 2007-05-28 14:11:32.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-015_migration_flatmem/include/linux/migrate.h 2007-05-29 10:00:09.000000000 +0100
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>
> typedef struct page *new_page_t(struct page *, unsigned long private, int **);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_MOVE_PAGES
> /* Check if a vma is migratable */
> static inline int vma_migratable(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> @@ -24,7 +24,14 @@ static inline int vma_migratable(struct
> return 0;
> return 1;
> }
> +#else
> +static inline int vma_migratable(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
I guess we get compilation failures because of the reference to
policy_zone here for the !NUMA case? I think vma migratable is not used at
all if !NUMA.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> extern int isolate_lru_page(struct page *p, struct list_head *pagelist);
> extern int putback_lru_pages(struct list_head *l);
> extern int migrate_page(struct address_space *,
> @@ -40,8 +47,6 @@ extern int migrate_vmas(struct mm_struct
> const nodemask_t *from, const nodemask_t *to,
> unsigned long flags);
> #else
> -static inline int vma_migratable(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> - { return 0; }
Maybe this block is not necessary?
> diff -rup -X /usr/src/patchset-0.6/bin//dontdiff linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-005_migrate_nocontext/include/linux/mm.h linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-015_migration_flatmem/include/linux/mm.h
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-005_migrate_nocontext/include/linux/mm.h 2007-05-24 10:13:34.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-015_migration_flatmem/include/linux/mm.h 2007-05-28 14:13:44.000000000 +0100
> @@ -242,6 +242,8 @@ struct vm_operations_struct {
> int (*set_policy)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mempolicy *new);
> struct mempolicy *(*get_policy)(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> int (*migrate)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, const nodemask_t *from,
> const nodemask_t *to, unsigned long flags);
> #endif
Correct.
> diff -rup -X /usr/src/patchset-0.6/bin//dontdiff linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-005_migrate_nocontext/mm/Kconfig linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-015_migration_flatmem/mm/Kconfig
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-005_migrate_nocontext/mm/Kconfig 2007-05-24 10:13:34.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc2-mm1-015_migration_flatmem/mm/Kconfig 2007-05-29 09:57:23.000000000 +0100
> @@ -145,13 +145,16 @@ config SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS
> config MIGRATION
> bool "Page migration"
> def_bool y
> - depends on NUMA
> help
> Allows the migration of the physical location of pages of processes
> while the virtual addresses are not changed. This is useful for
> example on NUMA systems to put pages nearer to the processors accessing
> the page.
>
> +config SYSCALL_MOVE_PAGES
> + def_bool y
> + depends on MIGRATION && NUMA
> +
Do we really need the CONFIG_SYSCALL_MOVE_PAGES? I think you will directly
access the lower levels. So why have it? CONFIG_SYSCALL_MOVE_PAGES ==
CONFIG_NUMA.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists