[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <465C6D78.9030009@atipa.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:14:16 -0500
From: Roger Heflin <rheflin@...pa.com>
To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Apparent Deadlock with nfsd/jfs on 2.6.21.1 under bonnie.
Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 12:16 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
>
>> Dave,
>>
>> Apparently there appears to be another different similar lockup,
>> The MTBF has risen from 1-2 hours without that patch to >100 hours,
>> so I am fairly sure the patch did correct the original lockup, or
>> at the very least make it a lot less likely.
>>
>> I hit the machine across NFS for 5 days before it deadlocked, before
>> the patch I could only get an hour or two (2-4 different tries).
>>
>> Given that pdflush is "D" it does not appear to be an NFS issue.
>>
>> Included is the sysrq-t.
>>
>> This is with 2.6.21.1 + the JFSIO patch.
>
> Is the system still in this state? Can you cat /proc/fs/jfs/TxAnchor
> (if CONFIG_JFS_DEBUG is defined) and /proc/fs/jfs/txstats (if
> CONFIG_JFS_STATISTICS is defined)?
>
> Thanks,
> Shaggy
Yes, the machine is still in that state.
Apparently I don't have either of those configured.
Anything else that we can collect before I rebuild the kernel with
those options setup?
Roger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists