[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070529123223.068eb97e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:32:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <christoph@...eter.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] hotplug cpu: migrate a task within its cpuset
On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:56:01 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > > When a cpu is disabled, move_task_off_dead_cpu() is called for tasks
> > > that have been running on that cpu.
> >
> > So I still have these three patches in the pending queue but I was
> > rather hoping that the scheduler, sched-domains and cpuset people
> > could take a look at them, please.
> >
> > They hit sched.c and cpuset.c mainly, and they might trash Ingo's CFS
> > patch (I haven't checked).
>
> The patch looks good to me. It applies cleanly ontop of CFS and it
> builds and boots fine with and without CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG (although i
> havent tried to explicitly stress the codepath in question). We are a
> bit paranoid in this codepath but it's not performance-critical
> normally.
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
I applied this to -mm, thanks.
The other two patches don't apply well to the current pending patch queue
and nobody seems keen on doing a serious review (or any review, iirc), so I
ducked them.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists