[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1180476943.20718.53.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:15:43 +1000
From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH][EXPERIMENTAL] Make kernel threads nonfreezable by
default
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 00:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 29 May 2007 14:59, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 14:15 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Please have a look at the current version of the patch (appended).
> > >
> > > I have followed the Nigel's suggestion not to change the current behavior
> > > in this patch (I'll add a couple of patches removing the freezability from
> > > some kernel threads), with one exception: I couldn't figure out any reason
> > > to have try_to_freeze() called in net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:svc_recv() .
> >
> > Thanks. IIRC, svcsock is related to the NFS server code.
> >
> > > I've also added a piece of documentation, freezing-of-tasks.txt . Please
> > > see if it's not missing anything (I'd like it to be quite complete).
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Mostly just grammar and the odd typo. On the whole, it's really well
> > written and perfectly readable - great job!
>
> Thanks a lot for all of the comments, they are really helpful. :-)
Thank you for doing all this work in the first place!
Acked-by: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
Regards,
Nigel
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists