[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <465CABA3.10003@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 18:39:31 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To: Gary Zambrano <zambrano@...adcom.com>
CC: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@...monizer.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
Gary Zambrano wrote:
> The b44 interrupt status reg returns a value of 0 if no interrupts are
> pending. The b44 uses a mask to determine which bits (events) can
> generate device interrupts on the system. If the masked interrupt status
> register bits are not asserted, then the b44 will return to the system
> with handled = 0.
> So, I think the way the b44 interrupt code is written should be ok and
> not a bug.
This is normal.
We check for 0xffffffff because that is often how a fault is indicated,
when the memory location is read during or immediately after hotplug (or
if the PCI bus is truly faulty). So for most hardware, you see
tmp = read(irq status)
if (!tmp)
return irq-none /* no irq events raised */
if (tmp == 0xffffffff)
return irq-none /* hot unplug or h/w fault */
and the method that determines no interrupt handling is needed.
Regards,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists