[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070529.160233.45506339.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NOHZ: prevent multiplication overflow - stop timer for
huge timeouts
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:47:39 +0200
> get_next_timer_interrupt() returns a delta of (LONG_MAX > 1) in case
> there is no timer pending. On 64 bit machines this results in a
> multiplication overflow in tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick().
>
> Reported by: Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> Make the return value a constant and limit the return value to a 32 bit
> value.
>
> When the max timeout value is returned, we can safely stop the tick
> timer device. The max jiffies delta results in a 12 days timeout for
> HZ=1000.
>
> In the long term the get_next_timer_interrupt() code needs to be
> reworked to return ktime instead of jiffies, but we have to wait until
> the last users of the original NO_IDLE_HZ code are converted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists