linux-kernel - Re: double exclamation (!!) suckage in the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 May 2007 10:26:05 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
cc:	Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, satyam.sharma@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: double exclamation (!!) suckage in the kernel

On Sat, 26 May 2007, Al Viro wrote:

> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:38:07PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> > Not exactly, if(foo) is the same as if( (int) foo), which is not
> > guaranteed to result in non-null values for non-null pointers.
> 
> RTFStandard.

... and don´t forget half of it untill you look up the next thing.
Yes, obviously I misremembered "compares equal to" as "is".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/