[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705300712230.5844@p34.internal.lan>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 07:15:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
To: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor@...aweb.hu>
cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
support@...lbox.intel.com
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.21.3 does not work with 8GB of RAM on Intel 965WH
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Look at how slow the raid benchmarks are in dmesg with 8GB of memory!
>>
>> [ 59.592560] raid6: using algorithm sse2x4 (476 MB/s)
>> [ 59.597558] raid5: using function: generic_sse (56.000 MB/sec)
>>
>> Yikes!
>>
>> With mem=4096M:
>> [ 60.336352] raid6: using algorithm sse2x4 (6804 MB/s)
>> [ 60.341345] raid5: using function: generic_sse (8552.000 MB/sec)
>>
>> What is going on here?
>>
>> Justin.
>
> I saw a similar effect on a P5 board that could
> only cache 64MB of memory a long time ago.
> Putting more memory into it made the machine slower
> and e.g. made the sym2 driver giving up at initialization.
> Maybe it's a modern reincarnation of the problem?
>
> Best regards,
> Zoltán Böszörményi
>
I see, so Intel 965 motherboards do not work with 8GB of memory? Or is
this a Linux issue?
I have an Intel Case ID open 225446 but so far we have not gotten anywhere
with this problem. Currently I have 8GB in the machine and boot with
mem=4096M. Was there any type of fix? Any recommendations as to what I
can do? Continue to speak with Intel? Or perhaps someone with more
knowledge of the kernel and chime in as to what exactly is happening here?
Justin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists