[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1180531067.24891.1.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:17:47 +1000
From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 13:40 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 01:49:21PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> (Trimmed the Cc:s quite heavily - I think this has gone somewhere beyond
> the original point)
>
> > Notice that we want to be able to suspend while hibernating -- for
> > suspend to both behaviour. So drivers may _not_ rely on system being
> > runnable.
>
> So keep the driver layers read-only and unfreeze the processes after
> doing the atomic copy.
I know you probably won't care, but that's not an option for Suspend2 -
I get the possibility of a full image by overwriting LRU pages that were
saved prior to the atomic copy.
That aside, keeping the driver layers read-only sounds more complicated
than just freezing processes.
Regards,
Nigel
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists