linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] lockstat: core infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070530134907.GA27085@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2007 15:49:07 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Bill Huey <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] lockstat: core infrastructure


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> [...] We can argue that sched_clock is "good enough".  If someone 
> wants better accounting of locks on some other arch, they can simply 
> change sched_clock to be more precise.

exactly. Imprecise sched_clock() if there's a better fast clock source 
available is a bug in the architecture code. If the only available 
clocksource is 1 msec resolution then there's no solution and nothing to 
talk about - lock statistics will be 1msec granular just as much as 
scheduling.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/