linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/10] Containers(V10): Basic container framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6599ad830705300702k3ce8d7a4obaba5dc869fc77e2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2007 07:02:00 -0700
From:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	dev@...ru, xemul@...ru, serue@...ibm.com, vatsa@...ibm.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, haveblue@...ibm.com,
	svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@...ibm.com, pj@....com,
	cpw@....com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	mbligh@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Containers(V10): Basic container framework

On 5/30/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Holy cow, do we need all those?

I'll experiment to see which ones we can get rid of.

>
> > +typedef enum {
> > +     CONT_REMOVED,
> > +} container_flagbits_t;
>
> typedefs are verboten.  Fortunately this one is never referred to - only
> the values are used, so we can delete it.

OK.

>
> Taking dcache_lock in here is unfortunate.  A filesystem really shouldn't
> be playing with that lock.

Is there a recommended way to do what I want to do, i.e. clear out all
the dentries from a virtual fs directory and rebuild them whilst
holding the directory's i_sem so no one can see the transiently empty
directory?

>
> The code's a bit short on comments.

I'll add some.

> > +     root = d_alloc_root(inode);
> > +     if (!root) {
> > +             iput(inode);
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
>
> I bet that iput() hasn't been tested ;)

Correct.

>
> People have hit unpleasant problems before now running iput() against
> partially-constructed inodes.

What kinds of problems? Are there bits of state that I should fully
construct even if I'm going to iput() it, or is there a better
function to call? fs/ext3/super.c seems to do the same thing.

> > +             if (ret)
> > +                     goto out_unlock;
>
> Did we just leak *root?

I believe we did. I'll fix that.

> >
> > +static inline void get_first_subsys(const struct container *cont,
> > +                                 struct container_subsys_state **css,
> > +                                 int *subsys_id) {
> > +     const struct containerfs_root *root = cont->root;
> > +     const struct container_subsys *test_ss;
> > +     BUG_ON(list_empty(&root->subsys_list));
> > +     test_ss = list_entry(root->subsys_list.next,
> > +                          struct container_subsys, sibling);
> > +     if (css) {
> > +             *css = cont->subsys[test_ss->subsys_id];
> > +             BUG_ON(!*css);
> > +     }
> > +     if (subsys_id)
> > +             *subsys_id = test_ss->subsys_id;
> > +}
>
> This ends up having several callers and its too large to inline.

Two large from a compiler PoV or from a style PoV? It's basically just
six dereferences and two comparisons, plus the BUG_ON()s.

>
> Do we actually want to support lseek on these things?
>
> If not we can leave this null and use nonseekable_open() in ->open.

I inherited that from cpusets without thinking about it too much. I
guess that we don't really need seekability.

> > +     } else if (S_ISREG(mode)) {
> > +             inode->i_size = 0;
> > +             inode->i_fop = &container_file_operations;
> > +     }
>
> The S_ISREG files have no ->i_ops?

Not currently. I don't see anything in inode_operations that we want
to be able to do on non-directories.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/