[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705302209.20963.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 22:09:20 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: nigel@...el.suspend2.net
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Sending signals to a kernel thread, broken in 2.6.22
On Wednesday, 30 May 2007 14:38, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:55 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > The g_file_storage driver uses a kernel thread and communicates with
> > that thread in part by means of signals. It also relies on the thread
> > receiving signals from userspace as an indication that the thread
> > should terminate.
> >
> > This was all working in 2.6.21, but as of 2.6.22-rc3 the signal
> > delivery mechanism (entirely within the kernel!) is no longer
> > functional.
> >
> > What's the story? Do I need to do something new and different to get
> > signals working again? Should I avoid using signals entirely?
> >
> > Thanks for any help,
> >
> > Alan Stern
>
> Hmm. Given Oleg's reply, it could pay to check that freezable kernel
> threads are still being frozen.
I think they are. Otherwise the freezer would have been failing.
> I'm about to go off to bed, and am away for half the day tomorrow, but
> will check as soon as I can if noone else gets to it first. (Rafael
> added for a heads-up, just in case he hasn't noticed this thread).
I have noticed it, but thanks anyway. :-)
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists