linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/3] Fix XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200705302348.54259.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2007 23:48:53 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] Fix XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY_V1 in compat mode

On Wednesday 30 May 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> 
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:59:55PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> 
> > +typedef struct xfs_fsop_geom_v132 {
> 
> wouldn't xfs_fsop_geom_v1_32
>                          ^
> 
> > +     __u32           blocksize;      /* filesystem (data) block size */
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +     __u32           dirblocksize;   /* directory block size, bytes  */
> > +} __attribute__((packed)) xfs_fsop_geom_v132_t;
> 
> and xfs_fsop_geom_v1_32_t
>                     ^
> 
> read better there?

Actually, the current convention would be struct compat_xfs_fsop_geom_v1
and compat_xfs_fsop_geom_v1_t.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/