linux-kernel - Re: GFP_DMA32 and PAE x86 machines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 May 2007 00:24:25 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	"Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...l.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GFP_DMA32 and PAE x86 machines

On Thursday 31 May 2007 00:07:45 Dave Airlie wrote:
> Depending on split all lowmem is below 1GB which isn't exactly
> optimal, I'd llike all 4GB for DMA.

Well it would be for a quite specialized limited use case: 
- Memory the kernel doesn't need to map (after all kmap is evil) 
- You need more than 500MB or so.
- 32bit kernel and user cannot run 64bit kernel
- Machine has >3GB of RAM 

Is there clear evidence that is a common issue? If it is just a "would
be nice to have in theory" the cost of doing a GFP_DMA32 for i386 would be
probably not worth doing it. If it's a common issue it might be 
considered, although the "here's a nickle. buy yourself a 64bit CPU"
strategy would also sound attractive. 

Please give a very very strong rationale why you want it. Did you actually
run into such a situation yourself yet?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/