[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <465E8F7C.7080300@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:03:56 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: clameter@....com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] CONFIG_STABLE: Define it
>> menu "General setup"
>>
>> +config STABLE
>> + bool "Stable kernel"
[...]
> a) Why in Kconfig, why not in Makefile?
>
> b) Of course nobody wants STABLE=n. :-) How about:
>
> config RELEASE
> bool "Build for release"
> help
> If the kernel is declared as a release build here, then
> various checks that are only of interest to kernel development
> will be omitted.
PS: Also, it could be reversed (e.g. config TESTBUILD) and put into the
Kernel Hacking submenu.
> c) A drawback of this general option is, it's hard to tell what will be
> omitted in particular.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= =====
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists