[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070531105321.GQ32105@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:53:22 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cotte@...ibm.com, hugh@...itas.com,
neilb@...e.de, zanussi@...ibm.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
On Thu, May 31 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2007 12:33:16 +0200
> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch removes the ->sendfile() hook from the file_operations
> > structure, and replaces the sys_sendfile() mechanism to be based on
> > ->splice_read() instead. There should be no functional changes.
> >
>
> > - retval = in_file->f_op->sendfile(in_file, ppos, count, file_send_actor, out_file);
> > + fl = 0;
> > + if (in_file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> > + fl = SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK;
> > +
> > + retval = do_splice_direct(in_file, ppos, out_file, count, fl);
>
> I like this, but are you sure it wont break user land ?
>
> Some applications might react badly if sendfile() returns EAGAIN ?
Yeah, I didn't actually intend for that to sneak in. I'd think that
userspace should handle it if they opened the file O_NONBLOCK (or used
fcntl()), but it's a change in behaviour none the less and probably not
a good idea.
Encourage those people to use splice() instead :-)
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists